Jump to content

mcallahan

+Premium Member
  • Posts

    6,495
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About mcallahan

  • Birthday 03/18/1979

Profile Information

  • Location
    North Austin
  • Tank Size
    375g
  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    anything to do with (non-frozen) water.

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.mrsaltwatertank.com
  • ICQ
    0

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

mcallahan's Achievements

Elite Reefer

Elite Reefer (6/6)

53

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by mcallahan

  1. Yes, 4 tangs is too much for a 55G tank. (makes me cringe when I read that question)

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Timfish

      Timfish

      Oh, and a 6" tang in a 120 will have the least favorable body to tank length ratio and about a 15% poorer biomass ratio than the 2" tangs in a 50.

    3. Robb in Austin

      Robb in Austin

      If 1 6" tang in a 120 is bad, 4 in a 55(same length, not as wide or tall as you know) can only be worse. It's not like they stay at 2". Short term, sure it works. In a year, prolly not.

    4. Timfish

      Timfish

      Please tell me why? If a 4' tank is too small for 4 2" tangs then a 8' tank is too small for 4 4" or if a 55g is to small for 4 2" then a 220 gal is too small for 4 4" because you're right you shouldn't plan them staying at 4"

×
×
  • Create New...