Jump to content

PIJAC - Aquatic Defense Fund


mFrame

Recommended Posts

post-884-0-24139100-1418756241_thumb.jpg

As those of you who made it to the fall frag swap are aware, the Austin Reef Club is accepting donations on behalf of the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council's Aquatic Defense Fund. Through our silent auction we raised $250 for the fund, and will continue the effort through 2015 to support this effort.

ARC will donate the TOTAL amount raised by you in addition to our own contribution. The more that club members contribute, the higher the portion that ARC will match. The drive will run through December 15th, 2015. Any funds donated by 12/20/2014 will be submitted to them this year.

So, what you do as a member get for donating? Glad you asked! Those who donate will receive:

  • the ability to display the "Aquatic Defense Fund" image in their signature (by donating at least $10)
  • an ARC car decal (by donating $15 or more)
  • $5 off a Premium Membership (by donating $25 or more)

post-884-0-83871800-1418756458_thumb.png

PIJAC is doing the important job of fighting to protect our right to maintain tanks with these wonderful critters we enjoy so much, so please consider supporting them.

Donations may be made by check or Paypal at the top corner of the main site page using the Donate button, or can be made directly to the fund via the ADF page Donate button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they have any public data on what percentages of donations actually go to their respective causes? Can't find them in guidestar or in the IRS non profit database.

Not super thrilled that several board members are actively involved in running puppy mills and selling puppies from them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do they have any public data on what percentages of donations actually go to their respective causes? Can't find them in guidestar or in the IRS non profit database.

More details can be found here

MEMORANDUM

To: MASNA

From: Aquatics Committee

Date: September 8, 2014

Do you love corals?

Following a 2009 petition from the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) to list 83 reef-building coral species for protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), on August 28, 2014, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed 20 species of corals as threatened species. The final listing includes 5 coral species from the Caribbean, and 15 Indo-Pacific coral species from the genera Acropora, Euphyllia, Montipora, Pavona, Porites, and Seriatopora.

NMFS had originally proposed to list 66 reef-building species as threatened and endangered in December, 2012. However, based upon substantial scientific information submitted by the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council (PIJAC) and other parties, NMFS determined only 20 of these species warranted listing as threatened species. Such scientific information included the submission of a scientific report developed by Dr. Charlie Veron, a world-renowned coral expert. PIJAC participated in the development of Dr. Veron’s work, and provided financial support enabling completion of this work.

In its final listing determination, NMFS elected not to apply the general ESA Section 9 “take” prohibitions to the newly-listed species. The term “take” is broadly defined to include a range of actions, including harassing, harming, injuring or killing a listed species. Instead, NMFS solicited comments regarding the appropriate scope of ESA Section 9 regulations, and indicated that it will consult with federal agencies and other partners to develop appropriate recovery strategies for the species.

PIJAC believes it likely that NMFS will apply the ESA Section 9 “take” prohibitions to the newly-listed coral species in the near future, consistent with prior agency actions. Application of these take prohibitions by NMFS could severely restrict or eliminate trade in these species. Such prohibitions may apply to both corals in the wild, as well as farm-raised corals. Such actions would be devastating to the marine aquarium hobby. Aquarium conferences, retail stores, wholesale suppliers, and coral farms would see an immediate direct impact, while manufacturers, dry goods suppliers, and mail order pet suppliers would experience the resulting loss of business too.

While we await further regulatory actions, anti-aquarium organizations will surely strive to create a social stigma for the aquarium industry by claiming, for example, that we are “trafficking in threatened and endangered species.” The emotion surrounding the subject will likely inflame public opinion and could motivate NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to enact stricter importation rules on all corals.

NMFS’ action to list these species was driven by a petition filed by CBD. CBD indicated in its petition that climate change presents a significant risk for these species, requiring listing of these species under the ESA. CBD, effectively, is attempting to use the ESA as a tool to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. NMFS, likewise, relied on the effects of climate change to justify listing these 20 species. However, scientific information developed by world-renowned scientists indicate that none of the 20 listed coral species warrant listing under the ESA. These experts have stated in recent comments that NMFS’ final rule is not supported by the best available scientific information.

The Solution

PIJAC acted quickly to provide the best available scientific information to NMFS in response to CBD’s petition to list corals. PIJAC’s efforts are largely responsible for the dramatic reduction in the number of species listed, and the fact that none of these species were listed as endangered. But that is not enough. PIJAC must continue to work with the scientific community to develop and submit scientific information regarding marine species. PIJAC must also remain engaged in the legal and policy issues arising now that these 20 coral species have been listed by NMFS under the ESA.

This is a time consuming and expensive process, and it requires your support. All funds donated to PIJAC’s Aquatic Defense Fund will be directed toward either this specific process, or other existing anti- aquarium campaigns.

Many eminent coral reef scientists are dismayed by the listing. ESA take prohibitions may be at odds with the best plan for the recovery of any coral species that might ever need a recovery plan– coral farming and restoration. ESA prohibitions may dramatically limit or eliminate conservation and education programs.

Please support PIJAC’s effort to defend our hobby against this and other actions including ones that aim directly to shut down our hobby. You can do so by making a donation, small or large.

Inspire your friends, your pet store, your aquarium club to do the same. If you have any questions for PIJAC, contact [email protected].

PIJAC’s Letter to MASNA

http://www.pijac.org/content/pijac-aquatic-committee-activities

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...