Had to do it over, I would only purchase the 12-24 and the 70-200. The 28-70, although a sharp shooter, renders very boring photos. Its perspective is too close to our eyes perspective and what you get are just dumb old snapshots. I did a portrait last night of a gal and her two retrievers that won two stakes in a field trial last week and I used one lens-12-24mm. Good depth of field at f8 and technicolor color rendition that made me look pretty good in low light/bad conditions. Here is a photo taken after 6:00pm, strobe on a strobe frame, with the 12-24mm: 12-24 Girl and Dog Portrait
I don't have many photos, if memory serves on my Mighty Dog site that were taken with the 28-70. I tend to use that for photos of stuff for ebay and craigslist. Ridiculously expensive lens for ebaying stuff. All of my outdoor action photography is with the 70-200 f2.8 and if I could only have one lens in the world, that would be it.
Okay, so this has gotten way off of the original question, but it has been good entertainment through a day when my schedule has not been too thick at the office and some nut decided to run a plane into an office building because he hates the government. Thanks for playing photography with me!
Mike